Central to the ethical discourse surrounding sex dolls is the concept of consent and agency. Since sex dolls are non-sentient objects, they do not possess consciousness or the capacity to consent, which complicates moral considerations. Critics argue that using such dolls could promote attitudes that diminish the importance of consent in human relationships or foster objectification. Conversely, some suggest that sex dolls are neutral tools that do not require consent, and their use can serve as a safe space for exploring fantasies or practicing intimacy without causing harm. Ethical concerns also extend to the potential impact on societal perceptions—whether reliance on dolls might influence attitudes toward real partners and consent dynamics. As technology advances, some propose the development of dolls capable of simulated responsiveness, raising further questions about agency, autonomy, and the moral implications of creating entities with programmed behaviors. Ultimately, ensuring respectful and ethical use involves recognizing the importance of consent in human interactions and understanding that sex dolls are artificial constructs that should not replace genuine mutual respect and agency in real relationships.